luke wasn’t A SUPERNATURAL HEALER?
When Christians defend the use of physicians, they often point to just two verses. The first is Colossians 4:14, where Paul writes:
Luke the beloved physician greets you, as does Demas. ESV
The second appears in Luke 5:31–32, where Jesus says:
“Those who are well have no need of a physician, but those who are sick. I came not to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance.”
Paul Didn’t Write “Beloved Physician”
This was a serious English translation error. The Greek word iatros — like the Hebrew rō·p̄ə·’ê — should never have been translated as “physician” in the New Testament. It historically refers to human healers, practitioners who relied on natural remedies, observation, diet, or other treatments — the secular healers of the body. From the time of Hippocrates, these healers were called iatros, and their methods were fully human, not supernatural.
There was only one word to use. Even in 16th-century English, the term “physician” was used broadly. University-trained physicians practiced natural remedies, apothecaries prepared potions, and other types of secular healers coexisted – all under the same label. In modern terms, a first-century iatros might be called a naturopath, using diet, regimen, and physical therapies, rather than potions or enchantment, to care for the body. But the early English Bible translators applied a single English word to cover a wide variety of human healing practices, erasing the original nuance and creating confusion.
Paul called Luke a “beloved iatros,” but this was not because he acted as a doctor or performed divine healing. Luke’s beloved status came from his faithfulness, loyalty, and obedience to the gospel, not his professional skill. Any involvement he had in Acts 28:9 would have been as a therapon, a servant assisting Paul, not a miracle worker.
Paul only used the word iatros because it was the only available term for a healer at the time. He understood, by context, the difference between human healing and supernatural healing (iaomai). Luke may have had some medical training — enough to recognize, name, and describe diseases — but he never exercised miraculous power. (You may have heard someone teach that Luke cared for Paul as his personal doctor. They are adding to scripture. At most, he might have bandaged his wounds – but that is also supposition.)
Supernatural Healing vs. Human Medicine
In the New Testament, the Greek verb iaomai describes divine healing, the work of God through faith in the Name of Yeshua. This is distinct from iatros:
| Term | Meaning | Method | Example |
| iaomai | Divine healing | Supernatural, by God’s power | Healing the centurion’s servant (Mt 8:13) |
| iatros | Secular physician | Natural remedies, observation, diet, regimen | Hippocratic physicians using diet or physical therapy. Healing the woman with issue of blood. (Mk 5:26) |
The apostles healed without medical knowledge, using only the authority God gave them. Jesus’ instructions in Luke 9:1–2 emphasize this: He sent the disciples to heal the sick and cast out demons, not to prescribe diets or prepare potions.
Even Luke, a trained physician, did not perform miracles on his own; the healings recorded in Acts were by the Spirit, through those empowered by Yeshua.
Modern Physicians as Spiritual Analogy
Today, the term “physician” still applies to a wide variety of practitioners:
- MD and some DO → mostly allopathic, relying on drugs and surgery.
- Naturopaths / functional medicine → focus on diet, lifestyle, and natural remedies.
- Chiropractors / osteopaths → structural or mechanical interventions.
All of these are generally called physicians, even though their philosophies differ. This mirrors the translation problem: a single word (iatros) applied to all human healers.
Modern physicians do not cast spells or invoke spirits overtly, but the system still exerts a subtle spiritual effect:
- Prognosis, diagnosis, and reassurances function as rituals instilling trust.
- Patients often place faith in human authority instead of God.
- Even well-intentioned care can replace reliance on divine healing with reliance on human skill, echoing the influence of ancient sorcery (pharmakeia).
If we were to translate the New Testament for the 21st century, every secular “physician” relying on human remedies, prognoses, and authority could be placed wherever the Bible uses “sorcerer” or “sorceress.” Not because modern doctors cast spells, but because, like the ancient pharmakoi, they exercise authority over healing apart from God, subtly replacing faith in Him with trust in human power.
Exodus 22:18 confirms God’s view of such practices: “Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live.” This shows how seriously God regards attempts to manipulate life or health outside His authority. God has taken away their death sentence because we should have all known by now to avoid them.
Why Paul Called Luke “Beloved”
Paul’s praise is simple and profound: Luke was faithful, loyal, and obedient.
- Like Paul, a redeemed Pharisee;
- Like Matthew, a redeemed tax collector;
- Like a redeemed physician assistant today —
Luke was beloved because he answered the call. His profession, medical knowledge, or skills mattered very little compared to his commitment to God’s mission. And of course, Luke never had significant power to heal anyone.
Let’s put this in perspective. If Luke had relied on secular medicine or claimed healing powers apart from God, Paul would not have called him “beloved.” Luke never relied on secular healing in place of God, unlike those today who practice modern pharmakeia and stand opposed to God’s covenantal healing (Rev 18:23; Gal 5:19–21).
Practical Lessons for Believers Today
1. Define your terms clearly:
- Physician (pharmakos): One who uses medicines or human methods to treat (not heal) the sick.
- Biblical secular healer (iatros): Human healer — natural remedies, diet, observation — relying on human skill, not God.
- Divine Healer (iaomai): Supernatural healing by God, known by context — Yeshua alone.
2. Recognize spiritual authority: True physical and spiritual healing comes only from God, in the Name of Yeshua. Human skill or medicine cannot substitute for divine power.
3. Understand the subtle trap: Even modern medicine, with its legal authority, examination rituals, differential diagnoses, medical prognosis, and multiple prescriptions, effectively redirects trust from our God who really heals, to mere human wisdom and superficial treatments. This is pharmakeia; what the Bible mistakenly calls sorcery.
4. Follow God’s call: Be faithful, obedient, and steadfast — that is what makes a servant beloved, not the profession, credentials, or skill set.
Conclusion – No Other Name
Luke’s title in most Bibles as “beloved physician” is a serious translation error. He was a human healer by training, possibly skilled in natural remedies, but the only true healer is Yeshua. Human physicians — MD, DO, naturopath, or chiropractor — can support health but cannot heal the soul or bring divine restoration. Jeremiah 6:7, 13-14 reveal how God sees their treatment as superficial. NLT makes the Hebrew easier to understand.
7 She spouts evil like a fountain.
Her streets echo with the sounds of violence and destruction.
I always see her sickness and sores.
13 “From the least to the greatest,
their lives are ruled by greed.
From prophets to priests,
they are all frauds.
14 They offer superficial treatments
for my people’s mortal wound.
They give assurances of peace (or well-being)
when there is no peace.
The false prophets and greedy priests were among the false secular healers of the day. The Hebrew word translated as “peace” is shalom: Peace, completeness, welfare, well-being, safety, prosperity. (abstractly) welfare, i.e. health, prosperity, peace.
God calls all Christians to trust Him for restoration, obedience, and healing. Luke’s life illustrates the principle: faithfulness to God, not human skill, makes a servant beloved. There is truly No Other Name that heals, saves, and makes His children whole except Yeshua.
If Luke was a physician like many rely on today instead of Jesus, Paul would not have called him “beloved!” He would have called him “evil” because “by his sorceries he has deceived all the nations.” Rev 18:23
APPLICATION FOR CHRISTIANS
Are you undecided? Do you still believe God approves of His children listening to a physician’s diagnosis and prognosis, and then obeying their advice? Then please reread your New Testament, replacing ‘physician’ with either ‘supernatural healer’ or ‘secular healer’ to see if it is a better fit with God’s Biblical view of health and healing. While this article has not mentioned the possibility that Luke might have been given the “gift of (iaomai) healings” (1 Cor 12:9), that is certainly another possibility.
There are two verses where Luke and Mark used a noun form of iaomai that likely refer to the ‘secular healers’ of the Greek methods founded by Hippocrates.
Hippocrates of Kos is universally recognized as the father of modern medicine, which is based on observation of clinical signs and rational conclusions. Before him, therapeutic attempts were based on religious or magical beliefs and were commonly practiced by priests, spiritual healers and witch-doctors.
Hippocrates was born in Kos, a Greek island of the southeastern Aegean. He was the son of Heraklides and belonged to a family of physicians who claimed their ancestry from Asclepius, the god of medicine. Hippocrates worked mainly in Kos and the nearby coast of Asia Minor (corresponding to present-day Turkey), but he also traveled extensively visiting other Greek regions including Athens, Thessaly and Thrace. His contribution to medical practice is characterized by ethical rules of conduct, close observation of clinical symptoms, an open mind for any ideas, and willingness to explain the cause of diseases. [Excerpted from Hippocrates of Kos, the Father of Clinical Medicine, and Asclepiades of Bithynia, the Father of Molecular Medicine, CHRISTOS YAPIJAKIS
When one looks at the verses in Luke 8:43 and Mark 5:25-26 they find out specifically why God (or Paul) would not approve of Luke if he was a ‘secular healer’ of the Hippocrates school.
43 A woman who had a flow of blood for twelve years, who had spent all her living on physicians and could not be healed by any,
25 A certain woman who had a discharge of blood for twelve years, 26 and had suffered many things by many physicians, and had spent all that she had, and was no better, but rather grew worse,
Both Luke and Mark concur that despite twelve years of physicians trying to heal the woman, they were always unsuccessful. Mark even adds that she got worse despite “suffering many things” at their hands. Mark also adds that the woman “spent all that she had.” Jesus did not charge for healing the sick. The disciples were told not to charge for the gift of healings they received. (Mt 10:8) Are these the “physicians” Jesus said sick people need in Luke 5:31-32? Impossible!!
Allopathic physicians of today are worse than the secular healers in the first century. The article excerpted above reveals those iatros (healers) who were trained in the school Hippocrates started (Asklepion schools and temples), did not include the use of poisonous medicines. This is supported by the Hippocratic oath – a major ethical approach to healing by Hippocrates which stated, “first, do no harm.” If they had used drugs in addition to God-forbidden “prognosis,” Luke and Mark would have referred to them as pharmakos instead of iatros.
Look at the Hippocratic Oath that is still recited by a few medical school graduates.
I swear by Apollo Healer, by Asclepius, by Hygieia, by Panacea, and by all the gods and goddesses, making them my witnesses, that I will carry out, according to my ability and judgment, this oath and this indenture.
To hold my teacher in this art equal to my own parents; to make him partner in my livelihood; when he is in need of money to share mine with him; to consider his family as my own brothers, and to teach them this art, if they want to learn it, without fee or indenture; to impart precept, oral instruction, and all other instruction to my own sons, the sons of my teacher, and to indentured pupils who have taken the Healer’s oath, but to nobody else.
I will use those dietary regimens which will benefit my patients according to my greatest ability and judgment, and I will do no harm or injustice to them.[6] Neither will I administer a poison to anybody when asked to do so, nor will I suggest such a course. Similarly I will not give to a woman a pessary to cause abortion. But I will keep pure and holy both my life and my art. I will not use the knife, not even, verily, on sufferers from stone, but I will give place to such as are craftsmen therein.
Into whatsoever houses I enter, I will enter to help the sick, and I will abstain from all intentional wrong-doing and harm, especially from abusing the bodies of man or woman, bond or free. And whatsoever I shall see or hear in the course of my profession, as well as outside my profession in my intercourse with men, if it be what should not be published abroad, I will never divulge, holding such things to be holy secrets.
Now if I carry out this oath, and break it not, may I gain for ever reputation among all men for my life and for my art; but if I break it and forswear myself, may the opposite befall me.[5] – Translation by W.H.S. Jones.
The Greek word Hippocrates used to describe the god Apollo is iatros. Hippocrates set this early group of secular healers apart (holy) from the sorcerers of the day. Modern allopathic medical schools have had to abandon this oath for obvious reasons.
Is it possible that Luke was trained in this school and took the took the Hippocratic Oath on completion? I think it probable, but like myself, on hearing (and his case seeing) real supernatural healing by Paul and Peter, he would have renounced his oath to the artificial gods. I firmly believe Luke was beloved of Paul because he accepted Jesus as the true supernatural healer. There is no evidence in scripture that he healed anyone, but if all he did was suggest the dietary change for Timothy, God would not be displeased.
Therefore, regarding Christians using allopathic physicians, consider that Luke was likely trained in the Hippocratic school of medical arts and would never prescribe poisonous drugs or cause an abortion. He would rely only on natural things to benefit his patients. If the born-again Christian can say no to their prescribed medicines – no matter what the prognosis, they are free to use them. As for me …
Behold, God is my salvation; I will trust, and will not be afraid; For GOD the LORD is my strength and song; And He is become my salvation.’ Isaiah 12:2
God bless you today and everyday ever after. May you find health, healing, and a full lifespan by trusting in the Name of Jesus for His promises. May He grant you forgiveness and mercy if you are unable or unwilling to repent of your sorceries at this time. God is patient, and with the help of the Holy Spirit, He will release you from the trap of being a patient.
Leave a Reply